| Structure | Single fact table connected to multiple denormalized dimension tables. | Hybrid structure with a mix of denormalized and normalized dimension tables. |
| Complexity | Simple and straightforward, easy to understand and navigate. | More complex due to the normalization of certain dimensions. |
| Data Redundancy | Higher redundancy due to denormalization; data may be duplicated in dimension tables. | Reduced redundancy in normalized parts of the schema, leading to potentially less storage use. |
| Query Performance | Generally faster for query performance because of fewer joins (denormalized data). | Slightly slower query performance due to additional joins needed for normalized tables. |
| Maintenance | Easier to maintain, as there are fewer tables and less complex relationships. | More challenging to maintain, as normalized tables introduce more relationships and dependencies. |
| Flexibility | Less flexible in terms of handling updates and changes in dimension attributes (due to denormalization). | More flexible for handling changes and updates to dimension attributes, as normalization allows for easier updates without affecting the entire table. |
| Use Case | Best for environments where simplicity and query performance are prioritized, such as dashboards and reporting. | Best for environments where data integrity and storage efficiency are critical, and some dimensions require normalization. |